بهره‌برداری تلفیقی پایدار از منابع آب در بخش کشاورزی: رویکرد ذخیره سیکلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد/ گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده عمران، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران

2 دانشجو کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی و مدیریت منابع آب/ دانشکده عمران، دانشگاه علم وصنعت ایران.

3 کاندیدای دکتری مهندسی و مدیریت منابع آب/ دانشکده عمران، دانشگاه علم وصنعت ایران

چکیده

بخش کشاورزی، بزرگ‌ترین مصرف‌کننده منابع آب است. بنابراین تخصیص پایدار آب به این بخش، امری لازم و ضروری است. منابع تأمین‌کننده نیاز آبی بخش کشاورزی منابع آب سطحی و زیرزمینی می باشند. مطالعات پیشین نشان داده اند که استفاده تلفیقی از منابع آب سطحی و زیرزمینی می‌تواند عرضه آب را مطمئن‌تر کرده و عدم قطعیت های آن را به شدت کاهش دهد. از رویکردهای بهره‌برداری تلفیقی از منابع آب های سطحی و زیرزمینی، می‌توان به دو رویکرد بهره برداری سیکلی و غیرسیکلی(سنتی) اشاره نمود. تفاوت اصلی این دو رویکرد در شیوه تغذیه مصنوعی آن هاست، به طوری که در سیستم های ذخیره غیرسیکلی، تغذیه مصنوعی فقط در مواقع سرریز آب از مخزن سطحی رخ می دهد و در مقابل در سیستم های ذخیره سیکلی، تغذیه مصنوعی می تواند در هر زمانی صورت پذیرد. به عبارت بهتر، در سیستم های غیرسیکلی، آب تنظیم شده هیچ گاه به سمت مناطق تغذیه مصنوعی هدایت نمی گردد. در این مطالعه، ضمن ارائه مفهوم و مدل برنامه ریاضی بهره برداری غیرسیکلی، پایداری تخصیص آب به بخش کشاورزی با رویکردهای سیکلی و غیرسیکلی کمی و مقایسه گشتند. نتایج نشان داد که در بهره‌برداری سیکلی از سیستم، با تغذیه آبخوان در فصول تر و استفاده از ذخیره آن در فصول خشک، به میزان قابل‌توجهی از هدررفت آب جلوگیری می‌شود. لذا با مدیریت و تنظیم بیشتر آب سطحی در بهره برداری سیکلی در مقایسه با بهره‌برداری غیرسیکلی، شاخص پایداری از 0.69 به 0.86 افزایش یافت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Sustainable Conjunctive operation of water resources in Agriculture Sector: Cyclic Storage Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abbas Afshar 1
  • Mina Khosravi 2
  • Amir Molajou 3
1 Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology
2 M.Sc. Student of Water Resources Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology.
3 PhD Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology.
چکیده [English]

The agricultural sector is the largest consumer of water resources. Therefore, Sustainable water allocation to this sector is more essential. Surface and groundwater are both important sources for agriculture water supply. Previous studies have emphasized that the conjunctive water use of surface and groundwater can reduce the risks associated with uncertain surface water supplies and their fluctuations. The cyclic and noncyclic(traditional) storage systems are two main kinds of conjunctive water use systems. The main difference between these storage systems is their method of artificial recharge which in the noncyclic storage system, the artificial recharge only occurs during the spill, but in the cyclic storage system, the artificial recharge can occur any time. In other words, the regulated water is not allocated to artificial recharge area in noncyclic method. In the current study it was tried to quantize and compare Sustainability of water allocation in the agriculture sector with cyclic and noncyclic approaches. The results indicated that in the noncyclic operation of the system, the aquifer is recharged in wet season and its storage used in dry season. Therefore, by management and regulation of surface water in cyclic operation compared with noncyclic operation, the sustainability index increases from 0.69 to 0.86, respectively.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agriculture
  • Conjunctive Operation
  • Cyclic Operation
  • Noncyclic Operation
  • Sustainability Index
Addams CL (2005) Water resource policy evaluation using a combined hydrologic-economic-agronomic modeling framework: Yaqui Valley Sonora, Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis: Stanford, California, Stanford University, 354 p
Afshar A, Ostadrahimi L, Ardeshir A, Alimohammadi S (2008) Lumped approach to a multi-period-multi-reservoir cyclic storage system optimization. Water Resources Management 22(12):1741-176
Afshar A, Zahraei A, Mariño MA (2010) Large-scale nonlinear conjunctive use optimization problem: Decomposition algorithm. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 136(1):59–71
Aguado E, Remson I (1974) Ground-water hydraulics in aquifer management. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 100(1):103-118
Alimohammadi S (2005) Optimum design and operation of joint surface and groundwater systems cyclic storage approach. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (In Persian)
Alimohammadi S, Afshar A (2005a) Optimum design of cyclic storage systems; distributed parameter approach: 1- system definition and model formulation. In: Proc. of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation, 15-17 September, Malta, 249-256
Alimohammadi S, Afshar A (2005b, September) Optimum design of cyclic storage systems; distributed parameter approach: 2-model solution methodology and analysis of results. In: Proc. of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation, 15-17 September, Malta, 243-248
 Alimohammadi S, Afshar A (2012) Cyclic Storage Systems Optimization; Design Model Fundamentals and formulation. Iran-Water Resources Research 7(3):1-20 (In Persian)
Alimohammadi S, Afshar A, Ghaheri A (2005) Unit response matrix coefficients Development: ANN approach. In: Proc. of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Systems Theory and Scientific Computation World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS-2005), 15-17 September, Malta, 17-25
Alimohammadi S, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2009) Cyclic storage systems optimization: Semidistributed parameter approach. Journal of American Water Works Association 101(2):90-103
Ashofteh PS, Haddad OB, Akbari-Alashti H, Marino MA (2014) Determination of irrigation allocation policy under climate change by genetic programming. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 141(4):1-12
Azaiez MN (2002) A model for conjunctive use of ground and surface water with opportunity costs. European Journal of Operational Research 143(3):611-624
Coe JJ (1990) Conjunctive use-advantages, constraints, and examples. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, ASCE, 116(3):427-443
Fasakhodi AA, Nouri SH, Amini M (2010) Water resources sustainability and optimal cropping pattern in farming systems; a multi-objective fractional goal programming approach. Water Resources Management 24(15):4639-4657
Fanai N, Burn DH (1997) Reversibility as a sustainability criterion for project selection. The International Journal of Sustainable Development World Ecology 4(4):259-273
Gorelick SM (1983) A review of distributed parameter groundwater management modeling methods. Water Resources Research 19(2):305-319
Hashimoto T, Loucks DP, Stedinger JR (1982) Reliability, resiliency, robustness, and vulnerability criteria for water resource systems. Water Resources Research 18(1):14-26
Lefkoff, LJ, Gorelick SM (1990) Benefits of an irrigation water rental market in a saline stream-aquifer system.Water Resources Research 26(7):1371-1381
Lettenmaier DP, Burges SJ (1982) Cyclic storage: A preliminary assessment. Groundwater 20(3):278-288
Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2018) Conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water to reduce soil salinization in the Yinchuan Plain, North-West China. International Journal of Water Resources Development 34(3):337-353
Liu L, Cui Y, Luo Y (2013) Integrated modeling of conjunctive water use in a canalwell irrigation district in the lower Yellow River Basin, China. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering ASCE 139(9):775-784
Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrological Sciences Journal 42(4):513-530
Maddock III T (1972) Algebraic technological function from a simulation model. Water Resources Research 8(1):129-134
Mendoza VM, Villanueva EE, Adem J (1997) Vulnerability of basins and watersheds in Mexico to global climate change. Climate Research 9(1-2):139-145
Safavi HR, Esfahani MK, Zamani AR (2014) Integrated index for assessment of vulnerability to drought, case study: Zayandehrood River Basin, Iran. Water resources management 28(6):1671-1688
Safavi HR, Falsafioun M (2017) Conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources under deficit irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 143(2)
Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks DP (2011) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 137(5):381-390
Singh A (2012a) Optimal allocation of resources for the maximization of net agricultural return. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 138(9):830-836
Singh A, Panda SN (2012) Integrated salt and water balance modeling for the management of waterlogging and salinization. I: Validation of SAHYSMOD. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 138(11):955-963
 Singh A, Panda SN (2012) Integrated salt and water balance modeling for the management of waterlogging and salinization. II: Application of Sahysmod. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 138(11):964-971
Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671-677
Wang CX, Li YP, Huang GH, Zhang JL (2016) A type-2 fuzzy interval programming approach for conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater under uncertainty. Information Sciences 340:209-227
Zongxue X, Jinno K, Kawamura A, Takesaki S, Ito K (1998) Performance risk analysis for Fukuoka water supply system. Water Resources Management 12(1):13-30