Alam AR (2004) The foundations of political science. NashreNey, 391p (In Persian)
Alemu and Dinar (2000) The process of negotiation over international water disputes:the case of the Nile Basin. International Negotiation 5(2):331-356
Asgar Khani A (2016) International regimes. Korsandi, 365p (In Persian)
Avarideh F (2018) Challenges, approaches of gap project in Turkey. Fourth Congress of the Engineering and Management of Water and Soil in Iran. University of Tehran (In Persian)
Bachrach P and Baratz MS (1962) Two faces of power. American Political Science Review 56(04):947-952
Barnett M and Duvall R (2005) Power in international politics. International Organization 59(1):39-75
Biswas AK (2011) Cooperation or conflict in transboundary water management: Case study of South Asia. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(4):662-670
Buzan B, Waever O and Wilde J de (1998) Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 239p
Cascão AE and Zeitoun M (2010) Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. In: Earle A, Jägerskog A and Öjendal J (eds) Transboundary Water Management: Principles and Practice. Earthscan, 27-42
Cox RW (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium 10(2):126-155
Cox RW (1983) Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium 12(2):162-175
Cox RW and Sinclair TJ (1996) Approaches to world order. Cambridge University Press, 552p
Dahl RA (1957) The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2(3):201-215
Daoudy M (2005) Le partage des eaux entre la syrie, l’irak et la turquie- negociation, securite, et asymetrie des pouvoirs. CNRS Éditions , 269p
Dinar A and Nigatu GS (2013) Distributional considerations of international water resources under externality: The case of Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt on the blue Nile. Water Resources and Economics 2(3):1-16
Dirzauskaite G and Ilinca NC (2017) Understanding “Hegemony” in international relations theories: comparative analysis of realism, liberalism and gramscian approaches of hegemony. M.Sc. Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark
Dombrowsky I (2010) The role of intra-water sector issue linkage in the resolution of transboundary water conflicts. Water International 35(2):132-149
Ghasemi H (2012) A critique of the future of power: the future of power or the future of United States?. Critical Studies in Text & Programs of Human Science 17(8):275-296 (In Persian)
Gill S and Law D (1988) The global political economy: perspectives, problems, and policies. Johns Hopkins University Press, 394p
Gioberti V (1851) Del rinnovamento civile d’Italia. A Spese Di Giuseppe Bocca, 752p
Gramsci A (1992) Prison notebooks. Columbia University Press, 654p
Iyob B (2010) Resilience and adaptability of transboundary rivers: the principle of equitable distribution of benefits and the institutional capacity of the Nile Basin. PhD Thesis, Oregon State University, United States
Jägerskog A (2003) Why states co-operate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden
Keohane R and Nye JS (1987) Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization 41(4):725-753
Khosravi A and Mirmohammadi M (2013) Reconstructing realism in Iranian culture and tradition. International Relations 5(18):107-136 (In Persian)
Kibaroğlu A (2002) Building a regime for the waters of the euphrates-Tigris River Basin. Kluwer Law International, 334p
Korkutan S (2001) The sources of conflict in the euphrates-Tigris Basin and its strategic consequences in the middle East. M.Sc.Thesis, Monterey, California, United States
Lukes S (2005) Power: A radical view. Palgrave Macmillan, 201p
Lustick IS (2002) Hegemony and the riddle of nationalism: The dialectics of nationalism and religion in the middle East. Journal of Modern Society & Culture 1(3):18-44
Mearsheimer JJ (2001) The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton & Company, 561p
Menga F (2014) Power and dams in central Asia. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Cagliari, Italy
Mianabadi H (2013) Political, security and legal considerations in trans-boundary river management. International Relations Research Quarterly 3(9):167-199 (In Persian)
Mianabadi H (2016) Hydropolitics and conflict management in transboundary river basins. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Mianabadi H, Mostert E and Van de Giesen N (2015) Trans-boundary river basin management: factors influencing the success or failure of international agreements. In: Hipel KW, Fang L, Bristow MH and Cullmann J (eds) Conflict Resolution in Water Resources and Environmental Management. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 133-143
Mirumachi N (2010) Study of conflict and cooperation in international transboundary river basins: The TWINS framework. Ph.D. Thesis, King’s College London, University of London, United Kingdom
Mirumachi N (2015) Transboundary water politics in the developing world. Routledge, 203p
Nnoli O (1986) Introduction to politics. Longman, 234p
Nye JS (1990) Soft power. Foreign policy (80):153-171
Nye JS (2004) Soft power and american foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly 119(2):255-270
Nye JS (2011) The future of power. PublicAffairs, 300p
Pohl B, Kramer A, Hull W, Blumstein S, Abdullaev I, Kazbekov J, Reznikova T, Strikeleva E, Interwies E and Görlitz S (2017) Rethinking water in central Asia. Adelphi and CAREC, Technical Report, 131p
Rees G (2010) The role of power and institutions in hydrodiplomacy: does realism or neo-liberal institutionalism offer a stronger theoretical basis for analysing inter-state cooperation over water security ?. M.Sc. Thesis, University of London, United Kingdom
Reisner M (1993) Cadillac desert: The American West and its disappearing water. Penguin, 582p
Rostami I (2015) Analysis of elements of Iranian national power from the perspective of the school of Realism, with emphasis on the theory of Hans J Morgenthus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tehran, Iran (In Persian)
Shariyatinia M and Tohidi Z (2013) Iran and Western structural power. Journal Foreign Relations 5(3):125-149
Sinaei V (2011) Hydropolitics and human security: water cooperation in relations between iran hydropolitics and human security: Water cooperation. Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs 2(3):111-134
Strange S (1989) Toward a theory of transnational empire. In: Tooze R and May C (eds) Authority and markets: Susan Strange’s writings on international political. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 161-176
Strange S (1990) Finance, information and power. Review of International Studies 16(3):259-274
Strange S (1994) Who governs? networks of power in world society. Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics 22(06):5-17
Swain A (2011) Challenges for water sharing in the Nile Basin: Changing geo-politics and changing climate. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(4):687-702
Tafesse F and Eguzozie K (2009) Efficient hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenylphosphate catalyzed by copper bipyridyl in microemulsions. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 72(3):954-959
UNEP (2016) Transboundary river basins: status and trends. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Nairobi, Technical Report, 378p
Wang Y-K (2004) Offensive realism and the rise of China. Issues and Studies-English Edition 40(1):173-202
Warner J (2004) Mind the gap-working with buzan: the Illisu Dam as a security issue. SOAS Water Issues Study Group, School of Oriental and African Studies/King’s College-London. Occasional Paper 67
Whittington D, Wu X and Sadof C (2005) Water resources management in the Nile Basin: The economic value of cooperation. Water Policy 7(3):227-252
Wu X (2000) Game-theoretical approaches to water conflicts in international river basins: A case study of the Nile Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States
Zeitoun M (2008) Power and water in the middle East: The Hidden Politics of the Palestinian-Israeli Water Conflict. I.B.Tauris, 241p
Zeitoun M and Warner J (2006) Hydro-hegemony- A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy 8(5):435-460
)
