عوامل مولد انسجام سیاستی جهت مقابله با بحران آب در ایران

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه علوم وتحقیقات تهران، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشکده مدیریت واقتصاد،دانشگاه علوم وتحقیقات، تهران، ایران

3 گروه مدیریت بهداشتی ودرمانی، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه علوم وتحقیقات تهران ،ایران

4 گروه اقتصاد، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه علوم وتحقیقات تهران، ایران

چکیده

زمینه: سیاستگذاری به عنوان اولین مرحله از تصمیم گیری در مدیریت و حل مسائل، بر مبنای اصولی اساسی پایه ریزی شده است و عدم توجه به این اصول در تدوین سیاستها، می تواند اجرای برنامه های عملیاتی را به شدت تحت تاثیر قرار دهد. انسجام سیاستی یکی از مهمترین این اصول اساسی در سیاستگذاری درست و عملی محسوب می شود و امروزه در میان سیاستگذاران و متخصصین علم سیاستگذاری بسیار مورد توجه است. هدف: با توجه به مساله مهم بحران آب در ایران و اهمیت سیاستگذاری درست و عملی جهت مقابله با این بحران، در این پژوهش بر شناسایی عوامل مولد انسجام سیاستی در حوزه آب ایران و چگونگی روابط آنها تمرکز شده است. روش پژوهش: با توجه به ماهیت کیفی و اکتشافی این پژوهش، از روش "نظریه داده بنیاد" جهت شناسایی عوامل مولد انسجام سیاستی در حوزه صنعت آب ایران و روابط بین این عوامل استفاده گردید. یافته ها: براساس نمونه گیری نظری که در نظریه داده بنیاد انجام می شود، پس از 22 مصاحبه باز و عمیق که با متخصصین حوزه آب ایران انجام شد تکرار مفاهیم اتفاق افتاد و نمونه گیری به اشباع رسید. 231 مفهوم ، 69 مقوله فرعی ودر نهایت 8 مقوله اصلی استخراج شد نتایج : 8 مقوله اصلی استخراج شده، بعنوان عوامل مولد انسجام سیاستی در حوزه آب ایران معرفی شدند و پس از کدگذاری انتخابی، الگوی روابط بین این عوامل نیز ارائه گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Policy Coherence Generators for Coping with Water Crisis in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mitra Ghasem Sharabiani 1
  • mohammadreza Razzavi 2
  • Seyed Jamaleddin Tabibi 3
  • Farhad Ghaffari 4
1 Department of Technology Management, Faculty of management & economy,Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran
2 Department of Technology Management. Faculty of management & economy.Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran
3 Department of Health and medical management, Faculty of management & economy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran
4 Department of Economy, Faculty of management & economy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran
چکیده [English]

Background: Policy-making is the first step in decision-making in managing and solving issues, based on the fundamental principles that failure to pay attention to these principles in the formulation of policies can affect the implementation of operational programs severely. Policy coherence is considered as one of the most important basic principles in sound policy making and today it is highly regarded among policymakers and policy making experts. Objective: Regarding the important issue of the water crisis in Iran and the importance of sound policy making to deal with this crisis, this research focused on identifying policy coherence generators in Iran's water domain and how their relationships. Methodology: Due to the qualitative and exploratory nature of this research, the " Grounded Theory " method was used to identify the policy coherence generators in water domain in Iran and the relationship between these factors. Findings: As the Theoretical Sampling is carried out in the Grounded Theory, after 22 open and deep interviews with Iranian water experts, repetition of concepts occurred and sampling was saturated. 231 Concepts, 69 Sub-Categories and finally 8 Main Categories were extracted. Conclusion: Extracted 8 Main Categories were introduced as policy coherence generators in Iran's water domain and after the Selective Coding, a pattern of relationships between these factors was also presented.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Policy making
  • Policy Coherence
  • Policy Coherence Generators
  • Water Crisis in Iran

Ashena H (2015) Water crisis or governance crisis. Shargh Economic Special Issue. Water Crises in Iran: page 40-44 (In Persian)

Babran S & Honarbakhsh N (2008) The water crisis in the world and Iran. Quarterly journal of strategy 16(48):193-212 (In Persian)

Boyce C & Neale P (2006) Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International Tool Series, Monitoring and Evaluation-2

http://www.pathfind.org/site/DocServer/m_e_tool_series_indepth_interviews.pdf?docID=6301

Brissalouis H (2004) Policy integration for complex policy problems, what, why and how. Greening of Policies: Interlinkages and Policy Integration Berlin, 3-4 Dec

Corbin J & Strauss A (1996) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin, Sage Press, London

Creswell J W (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: sage Press, 342 p

Danaiefard H, Eslami A , Maghsoodi A (2011) The application of research strategy Grounded Theory in practice -making of organizational apathy t heory. Imam Sadiq University Press,178 P (In Persian)

Duraiappah A K & Bhardwaj A (2007) Measuring policy coherence among the MEAs international institute for sustainable development. Technicalreport of International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), http://www.iisd.org,53 p

Ebtekar M (2015) Rendering damages continues to threaten resources. Shargh Economic Special Issue,Water Crises in Iran:137-141(In Persian)

Eftekhari A (2000) Israel and the water crisis. Regional Studies, Quarterly 5(3):99-116 (In Persian)

Emadi M H (2015) What water crisis?. Shargh Economic Special Issue, Water Crises in Iran:6-8 (In Persian)

Noori Esfandiari A (2015) Assessment of water governance in Iran. Shargh Economic Special Issue, Water Crises in Iran: 45-48 (In Persian)

Geerling S A (2003) The integration of land use planning, transport and  environment in European policy and research. Transport policy journal 10:187-196

Fahmi H (2015) The crisis is the outcome of our collective performance. Shargh Economic Special Issue, Water Crises in Iran:26-33 (In Persian)

Hoebink P (2010) European development cooperation in between the local and the global. European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes-Amsterdam University Press, www.eadi.org, 337 p

Haghighi B (2013) Promotion plan on improving management and optimal water consumption in the agricultural production process. Iran Agricultural Ministry, Technical report (In Persian)

HajBagheri M A (2006) The grounded theory research methodology: The method of theorizing in the humanities and health sciences. Boshra Publishing and promoting Press (In Persian)

Janbaz H (2015) Iran-Water Resources Research (IR-WRR), 10(3): Preface (In Persian)

Khaki Gh (1999) Research methodology with thesis approach. Rebecca Press, 498 p (In Persian)

Kassaie A (2004) Water crisis in central asia and rotation in foreign policy. Central Asia and Caucasus Studies, Quarterly 10(48):213-234 (In Persian)

Kautto N (2011) Towards more coherent and sustainable biomass policy/examining european biomass-to-energy planning. Doctoral Dissertation, Sweden, Lund University, 210 p

Madani K, AghaKouchak A, Mirchi A (2016) Iran’s socio-economic drought: Challenges of a water-bankrupt nation. Iranian Studies journal 49(6):997–1016

Merriam S (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Press, San Francisco, 275 p

Mirnezami S J, Bagheri A (2017) Assessing the water governance system for groundwater conservation in Iran. Iran-Water Resources Research (IR-WRR) 13(2):32-55 (In Persian)

Mohammadi  B (2006) Principles of qualitative research methodology: basic theory, procedures and practices (by Strass, Corbin). Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies Press, Tehran, Third Book (In Persian)

Momeni F (2015) Political economy of the water crisis in Iran. Shargh Economic Special Issue, Water Crises in Iran: 49-51 (In Persian)

Mosavi M (2016) Iran-Water Resources Research (IR-WRR) 12(1): Preface (In Persian)

Nilsson M Z, Petersen T E, Nykvis J, Peter T B R and McGuinn J (2012) Understanding policy coherence: Analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the envinment. Environmental Policy and Governance Journal 22:395-423

OECD (2009) Building blocks for policy coherence development. Technical report, https://www.oecd.org/pcd/44704030.pdf,90 p

Picciotto R (2005) The evaluation of policy coherence for development. Evaluation Journal 11:311-330

Reyes-Mendy F, Arriagada R A, Reyes-Paecke S, Bello A, & Tobar A (2014) Policy statement coherence: A methodological proposal to assess environmental public policies applied to water in Chile. Environmental Science & Policy Journal 42:169-180

Rezaie Eskandari D (2010) The global outlook for water crisis; case study: The water crisis in central Asia; reasons and solutions. Central Asian and Caucasus Quarterly Journal 69(1):51-74 (In Persian)

Saiedi S (2015) Dead life on the lakes. Shargh Economic Special Issue: Water Crises in Iran17-18 (In Persian)

Siitonen L (2016) Theorising politics behind policy coherence for development (PCD).The European Journal of Development Research (EJDR) 28(1):1-12

van der Hoeven R (2008) Policy coherence,the newest fad in the international discourse?. 12th EADI General Conference-Golobal Governance for Sustainable Development, Geneva          

Yin R K (2004) Third edition of complementary methods for research in education. American Educational Research Association Press, Washington, DC

Warfield  J (1974) Developing interconnected matrices in structural modelling. IEEE transaction on Systems Men and Cybernetics:51-81

Zakai M S (2002) Theory and research in qualitative methods. Allameh Tabatabai University of Social Sciences  Press (In Persian)

Zargarpour R, Nourzad A (2009) A conceptual model of integrated water resources management for national water security. Iran-Water Resources Research (IR-WRR) 5(3):1-13 (In Persian)