استفاده از روش ورشکستگی در کاهش منازعات منابع آب زیرزمینی و طرح تعادل‌بخشی آبخوان (مطالعه موردی: آبخوان حاجی‌آباد)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی و مدیریت منابع آب، دانشکده مهندسی عمران، آب و محیط زیست، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشگاه شهید بهشتى

چکیده

در دهه‌های اخیر، افزایش نیازهای آبی در ایران منجر به برداشت بیش از حد آب، به ویژه آب زیرزمینی شده‌است لذا مدیریت آب زیرزمینی و برداشت‌ها باید طوری باشد که علاوه بر رفع نیاز مصرف‌کنندگان و رسیدن به نفع عادلانه، پایداری آبخوان و نیاز آیندگان نیز مور توجه قرار گیرد. این تحقیق با هدف مدیریت و کاهش برداشت از آبخوان حاجی‌آباد واقع در استان هرمزگان انجام شده‌است. ابتدا مدل جریان آب زیرزمینی به وسیله نرم‌افزار MODFLOW شبیه‌سازی و صحت‌سنجی شده سپس با استفاده از روش همکارانه (روش ورشکستگی)، مقادیر جدید برداشت آبخوان محاسبه گردید و این مقادیر به مدل شبیه‌سازی وارد و نتایج آن با وضع موجود مقایسه گردید. در این پژوهش از 5 روش ورشکستگی نسبی(P)، ورشکستگی مقید به سود یکسان(CEA)، ورشکستگی مقید به ضرر یکسان(CEL)، تالمود (Talmud) و پینایل (Piniles) به منظور مدیریت برداشت چاههای بهره‌برداری استفاده شده‌است. مقادیر برداشت سالانه چاههای بهره‌برداری از آبخوان به عنوان تقاضای ذینفعان و مقدار تغذیه آب زیرزمینی محاسبه‌شده توسط مدل شبیه‌سازی در هر پلیگون به عنوان مقدار آب موجود است. در این 5 روش مقادیر سطح آب زیرزمینی آبخوان افزایش و وضعیت کلی آبخوان بهبود نسبتا خوبی داشته‌است. در نهایت شاخص پایداری ورشکستگی (BASI) برای 5 روش محاسبه و مقایسه گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Bankruptcy Method in Reduction of Groundwater Resources conflicts and Aquifer Balancing (Case Study: Haji Abad Aquifer)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mona Jamalomidi 1
  • Ali Moridi 2
1 Master student of water resources management and engineering, Water Resources Engineering Department, Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
2
چکیده [English]

In recent decades, increasing water demand in Iran has resulted in excessive water usage, specially groundwater. Due to the increase in aquifer water usage, groundwater management should considerate to meet consumers needs and achieving a fair benefit in addition aquifer sustainability and future needs. This study aimed to manage and reduce water usage of Haji Abad aquifer in Hormozgan province. first, Groundwater simulation model was calibrated and validated by MODFLOW software and then, the new operation wells discharge values were calculated by using the cooperative method (bankruptcy) and these values were entered into the simulation model and the results were compared with the current situation. In this study, five bankruptcy methods proportional (P), Constrained Equal Award (CEA), Constrained Equal Loss (CEL), Talmud (Tal) and Piniles (Pin) are used to manage operation wells discharge, The annual discharge values of the operation wells are claimer demand and the amount of groundwater recharge which calculated by the simulation model in each polygon are the available water. In these five methods, groundwater head increased and overall aquifer status improved relatively well. Finally, the Bankruptcy Allocation stability index (BASI) for five methods was calculated and compared.compared.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • MODFLOW
  • Bankruptcy Method
  • Groundwater sustainable development
  • Cooperative method

مراجع

Aghasian K, Moridi A, Mirbagheri A, and Abbaspour M (2019) A conflict resolution method for waste load reallocation in river systems. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, Springer Berlin Heidelberg 16(1):79–88
Akbar Zadeh M, Ghahraman B, and Davary K (2016) Optimization of groundwater quality monitoring network in Mashhad Aquifer using spatio-temporal modeling. Iran-Water Resources Research, PhD Candidate, Irrigation & Drainage, International Campus, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran 12(1):133–144
Ansink E and Weikard H-P (2012) Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems. Social Choice and Welfare 38(2):187–210
Auman R and Maschler M (1985) Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory 36(2):195–213
Banihabib M E and Najafi Morghmaleki  S (2018) Assessment of game and bankruptcy theories to supply environmental water of Hawizeh Wetland. Iran-Water Resources Research 14(2):12–22 (In Persian)
Burn D H and Lence B J (1992) Comparison of optimization formulations for waste-load allocations. Journal of Environmental Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers 118(4):597–612
Burn DH and McBean EA (1985) Optimization modeling of water quality in an uncertain environment. Water Resources Research 21(7):934–940
Dagan N and Volij O (1993) The bankruptcy problem: A cooperative bargaining approach. Mathematical Social Sciences, Citeseer 26(3):287–297
Estalaki SM, Abed-Elmdoust A, and Kerachian R (2015) Developing environmental penalty functions for river water quality management: Application of evolutionary game theory. Environmental Earth Sciences 73(8):4201–4213
Herrero C and Villar A (2001) The three musketeers: Four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems. Mathematical Social Sciences 42(3):307–328
Ketabchi H and Ataie-Ashtiani B (2011) Development of combined ant colony optimization algorithm and numerical simulation for optimal management of coastal aquifers. Iran-Water Resources Research 7(1):1–12 (In Persian)
Liebman JC and Lynn WR (1966) The optimal allocation of stream dissolved oxygen. Water Resources Research 2(3):581–591
Loáiciga HA (2004) Analytic game- Theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. Journal of Hydrology 297(1–4):22–33
Loehman E, Orlando J, Tschirhart J, and Whinston A (1979) Cost allocation for a regional wastewater treatment system. Water Resources Research 15(2):193–202
Madani K and Dinar A (2013) Exogenous regulatory institutions for sustainable common pool resource management: Application to groundwater. Water Resources and Economics 2–3:57–76
Madani K and Zarezadeh M (2012) Bankruptcy methods for resolving water resources conflicts. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries, 2247–2252
Madani K, Zarezadeh M, and Morid S (2014) A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(8):3055
Mianabadi H, Mostert E, Zarghami M, and van de Giesen N (2014) A new bankruptcy method for conflict resolution in water resources allocation. Journal of Environmental Management 144:152–159
Mirshafee S, Ansari H, and Mianabadi H (2015) Bankruptcy methods in transboundary rivers allocation problems, Case study: Atrak River. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 9(4):594–604 (In Persian)
Moridi A (2018) A bankruptcy method for pollution load reallocation in river systems. Journal of Hydroinformatics, IWA Publishing 21(1):45–55
Najjar Ghabel  S, Zarghami M, Akhbari M, and Nadiri AA (2019) Groundwater management in Ardabil Plain using agent-based modeling. Iran-Water Resources Research 15(3):1–16 (In Persian)
Nikoo MR, Kerachian R, Karimi A, and Azadnia AA (2013) Optimal water and waste-load allocations in rivers using a fuzzy transformation technique: A case study. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185(3):2483–2502
O’Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences 2(4):345–371
Zare Farjoudi S, Moridi A, and Mousavi Nadoushani S (2019) Applying bankruptcy approach in allocating point and non-point pollution in rivers. Iran-Water Resources Research 15(2):88–97 (In Persian)

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار